The human has
benefitted throughout centuries from the Great Plains, but the argument can
also be framed that the same benefits to humans have caused disturbance and
trauma to the ecosystem of the Great Plains. The European settlers benefitted
from the burgeoning fur trade of bison and beaver furs which they were able to
transport via Missouri River from trading posts to St. Louis (Wishart 2006)
which though led to the drastic decrease of bison and beaver populations. Since
the early settlers populated the area, the Great Plains has been used
extensively for agriculture. Enterprises like cropping, mining, forestry and
tourism were developed which yielded resources to humans and provided them with
aesthetic pleasures (Mather 1972). The agriculture has been important for the
local economies in the Great Plains. For example, the Glaciated Missouri
Plateau has been the most heavily farmed areas in the northern Great Plains,
with wheat being the no.1 cash crop (Mather 1972). Moreover, livestock
production also contributed to the Great Plains economy. It was estimated in
1970 that the livestock production has acted a big role in maintaining the
economy, with the northern Great Plains area supporting about 12 million
livestock like cattle or sheep (Wight 1976). Although deeply traumatic to the
Great Plains ecosystem, the mining industries have been in action in Great
Plains. An amount of 50,000 to 120,000 methane wells were estimated to be
drilled in the Powder River Basin of Wyoming for the mining industry (Wishart
2006) which would benefit humans but at the jeopardy of the ecosystem.
What contributed the well-being of both
human beings and the Great Plains ecosystem are the numerous National
grasslands and wildlife refuges as most of the National Grasslands in the US
are located in the Great Plains (Wishart 2006). Those areas could be used to
raise livestock but more often are provided as scenery attractions for their
aesthetic beauties.
No comments:
Post a Comment