Wednesday, December 3, 2014

BALANCE BETWEEN PEOPLE AND ECOSYSTEMS


Temperate grasslands, having less than one percent of protected lands, is the least protected biome in the entire world (Forrest).
      Several conservation organizations are making collaborate efforts in means of restoring the Temperate Grasslands. Organizations collaborating with WWF are targeting the most effective options toward biome preservation through the use of science and metrics(“Northern Great Plains”). Organizations can now target possible threats and changes through the utilization of certain scientific strategies. WWF may detect areas impacted by possible threats or areas that display high opportunity for conservation in order to prioritize their plans (“Northern Great Plains”).
WWF utilizes its resources in order to detect areas of high conservation opportunity. These strategies allow organizations to prioritize their future plans ("Northern Great Plains"). 

WWF uses strategic methods in order to detect possible threats in the ecosystem ("Northern Great Plains").

      Organizations such as the World Wildlife Fund, the Wildlife Conservation Society, and the Northern Plains Conservation Network are working to minimize the impact of human activities upon the ecosystem within the Northern Great Plains. The WWF is working to ensure that public lands are protected against disturbances, like energy and crop production (“Northern Great Plains”). They are sharing their visions with land management directors at a local and national level (“Northern Great Plains”). Like the Northern Plains Conservation Network, other organizations are presenting landowners, tribes, and government officials with the possible benefits they may gain in joining the efforts to establish a balance between people and the ecosystem (“What We Do”). The NPCN is working to preserve grassland birds- birds that are said to be vital for economic, aesthetic, and cultural reasons (“What We Do”). This organization proposes the idea that changes made in land development, land use, and grazing policies may benefit grassland habitats and species (“What We Do”). Various factors may affect the development of the species; therefore, organizations are pushing for any prospective change. Some changes can even provide land owners and ranchers potential benefits at a minimal cost. The NPCN's endeavors also include the restoration of bison, whom were the dominant herbivore in North America (“What We Do”). Bison influenced the structure of the natural cycles within the ecosystem (“What We Do”). NPCN is contributing their full efforts in providing those who want to restore the bison population in the Northern Great Plains.
      Also, WWF is collaborating with ranchers in the effort to promote new market opportunities while exercising sustainability in the production of beef (“Northern Great Plains”). With these efforts, the grassland landscapes and farming communities have higher chances of prosperity. These deals allow for mutual benefits that may influence other industries to join the efforts of preserving the Great Northern Plains (“NORTH AMERICA’S NORTHERN GREAT PLAINS Restoring One of the World’s Premier Grassland Ecosystems”). The Wildlife Conservation Society also plays a grand role in monitoring the relationship between ranchers and Great Plains habitats. The WCS works with partners in order to identify how grassland conservation can be integrated into the lives of farmers ("Great Plains, USA & Canada").


FUTURE OF THE NORTHERN GREAT PLAINS

          Although an ecosystem sustained by innate change, the Northern Great Plains will demonstrate significant impact in the future due to modern changes that threaten the well being and natural development of the ecosystem (“Northern Great Plains”).
          The land's fertile farmland sustains the production of several crops. Grassland conversion into crops plays a significant role in the future of the Northern Great Plains. Wheat, corn, and soybeans are the major crops in the area. Wheat, taking up 1, 037, 843 acres of land, is the most produced crop in the Northern Great Plains(Rashford). Studies investigate the impacts of changes in crop prices, government payments and climate in order to obtain an enhanced understanding on the possibility of grassland conversion in the Northern Great Plains (Rashford).Grassland in North Dakota faces the greatest risk of grassland conversion due to the increase of price on corn (Rashford). If crop prices increase linearly until 2030, North and South Dakota are expected to lose 3 million acres of grassland to cropland; however, Montana, Wyoming, and Nebraska will maintain its grasslands (Rashford). By 2060, an additional 700,00 acres of grassland will disappear in North and South Dakota (Rashford). Government payments also influence landowners in making the decision to convert grassland into crops; thus, without government security, the Northern Great Plains would inhabit an additional 5.5 million acres of grassland (Rashford).
 This chart illustrates a comparison of the presence of cropland in the Northern Great Plains (Rashford).
          The grassland also faces great threat with the possibility of extreme climate change (“Northern Great Plains”). Areas that are predicted to become warmer and wetter are more likely to be chosen for cropland; whereas, regions that are expected to become warmer and drier are most likely to be safe from grassland conversion Rashford). Eastern Montana, an area currently suitable for cropland, may become much more appealing for cropland (Rashford).
          Without a doubt, grassland conversion and climate change significantly disturbs the biological cycles in the Northern Great Plains. Species that better prosper in certain habitats will be forced to migrate. These species will find it difficult to adapt to new environments that do not suit their chances for survival (Shafer). North Dakota hosts 40% of the 1 million waterfowl that settle in the region (Rashford). Waterfowls are expected to move from North Dakota to Montana and South Dakota; thus, implicating a greater significance on wetlands in these areas in order to protect the waterfowls (Rashford).
          If more changes are introduced into the ecosystem, the biological balances within the ecosystem will be disturbed and affect the species that are dependent on various natural factors. Human activities must find a manner to simultaneously exist with species that thrive within the ecosystem. 

Saturday, November 29, 2014

Protected Areas of the Northern Great Plains

            Today, the Northern Great Plains of North America—once as ecologically diverse as the African savannah—is extremely endangered due to overgrazing, intensive agriculture and natural resource extraction. Only 2% of the millions of hectares of the Northern Great Plains is currently protected in reserves, making it one of the most endangered ecosystems on earth. The protected areas that do exist are distributed throughout the two Canadian provinces and five U.S. states that make up the Northern Great Plains. Some are privately owned, while others are public domain stewarded by conservation agencies (“Northern Great Plains, USA & Canada”).            
            One such public protected area is the Charles M. Russell National Wildlife Refuge (NWR), which spans over 1 million acres of short grasslands along the Missouri River in Montana (“About the Refuge – Charles M. Russell”). The area was officially established in 1978 when an existing game range was renamed and consolidated under the National Wildlife Refuge System Administration Act of 1966 (“History of the Refuge – Charles M. Russell”). Managed by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service in an effort to conserve the area’s wildlife and habitat today and into the future, the Charles M. Russell NWR is the second-largest Refuge in the contiguous United States. It is home to several native Grassland species, including elk, bighorn sheep, and bald eagles; and it boasts a landscape rich with prairies, rivers and coulees (ravines) (“Charles M. Russell National Wildlife Refuge”). Much of the Charles M. Russell NWR has been left rather untouched because of the area’s extensive size and remoteness (“About the Refuge”). Nonetheless, the area was once home to the largest wild bison herd in North America, which decades of human settlement and overexploitation of resources decimated. Moreover, limited funding and declining public interest could threaten the future health and longevity of the Reserve. Today, however, the efforts of groups such as the National Wildlife Federation are helping to improve the status of this protected area. Bison are slowly being reintroduced in free-roaming herds, and the Refuge monitors the numbers of endangered species to ensure sustainable populations. The strong long-term management plan advocated by the National Wildlife Federation and the Nature Conservancy holds the potential to restore the area’s species and habitat, further improving its status (“Charles M. Russell”).
Bison, once nearly extinct in the Northern Great Plains, have recently been reintroduced to the Charles M. Russell National Wildlife Refuge. (Image courtesy of mountainwestnews.org)
            An important protected area in Canada is Grasslands National Park, located in southwest Saskatchewan. It is the only national park in Canada that protects the mixed-grass prairie ecosystem and contains the most undisturbed tract of native prairie in the country (“Grasslands National Park: Introduction”). A variety of geological features from wooded coulees to grasslands to sand dunes characterize the Park, a rich ecosystem that contains over 40 types of grasses. The Park is the only place in Canada where the black-tailed prairie dog still exists in its natural habitat. The black-footed ferret, North America’s most endangered mammal, also calls the Park home. The critical status of these two species, along with the burrowing owl and greater prairie chicken, pose a threat to the livelihood of species that prey on them, such as coyotes, foxes, wolves, and hawks. Efforts by the Park and the Nature Conservancy of Canada (which is currently purchasing land from ranchers to add to the park) aim to reintroduce self-sustaining, wild populations of coyotes and wolves, which have been highly endangered since the 1930s, have thus far been rather successful (“Grasslands National Park”). Megafauna such as bison, elk, and grizzly bears have all but completely disappeared from Grasslands National Park because of hundreds of year of over-plowing the grasslands and over-slaughtering these species as prescribed by various homestead and land development acts in the 19th and 20th centuries, though a bison re-introduction project began in 2006 when 70 bison were brought from Elk Island National Park in Alberta (The Gazette (Montreal)). Thus because the Grasslands National Park is heavily protected under Canadian law and through the work of the World Wildlife Federation and similar conservation agencies, it will likely continue to thrive into the future as a protected area and site of tourist interest.
Grasslands National Park, located in Saskatchewan along the Montana border, is split into a western and an eastern portion. (Image courtesy of greatcanadianparks.com)
            Suffield National Wildlife Area (NWA) in Alberta, Canada, is another crucial protected area of the Northern Great Plains. The NWA is one of the largest, most ecologically diverse areas of untouched grassland remaining in Canada, making it the most likely of any NWA to be able to recover lost habitat and species on a large scale. Suffield NWA, protected as part of the Canadian Forces Base Suffield since 1971, was formally established in 2003 for this exact reason (“Canadian Forces Base Suffield National Wildlife Area”). It contains grasslands, ancient glacial valleys, coulees, sand hills, cottonwood forests, small wetlands, and the Saskatchewan River. Nearly one hundred endangered species inhabit the Suffield NWA (Pence). Some, like the western prairie mouse, are endemic to the area; and all of them depend on grasslands-specific climate and fire conditions to survive. Suffield NWA is protected under the Canada Wildlife Act and the National Defense Act, which prohibits public access and human activities like hunting or recreation. Despite strict protections that have precipitated a rather good environmental status for the area, like in the vast majority of the Northern Great Plains, bison have disappeared from the Suffield NWA. In 1997, elk were reintroduced to fill the large herbivore niche vacated by bison. Suffield has been a site of contention between environmentalists and natural gas companies; for it contains more than one thousand gas wells and an extensive accompanying network of pipelines, owned jointly by Alberta’s provincial government and the federal government (“Canadian Forces Base Suffield National Wildlife Area”). In 2005, the EnCana Corporation put forward a proposal to more than double the number of shallow natural gas wells. Seven years later in 2012, the federal government rejected the proposal, citing threats to at-risk wildlife, environmental degradation, and public concern as outweighing potential benefits of the project (Pence). Today, Suffield NWA remains highly valued as a space of environmental diversity and thus well-protected from future drilling projects. 
Suffield National Wildlife Area sits alongside the Saskatchewan River in Alberta, Canada. (Image courtesy of Environment Canada) 

The Human Impacts on the Great Plains

The Human Impacts on the Great Plains
       
                       The human has had historically impacted the Great Plain pretty negatively. The most general force that changed the ecosystem of the Great Plain was through the development of agriculture and overgrazing following the human settlements (Hidinger 2000). The farmers, moreover, are changing their farms into monoculture rather than diversifying the farms and are more and more converting marginal lands into agricultural lands with the application of genetically modified crops (Higgins, Naugle and Forman 2002). This caused the severe loss of wildlife habitats and the decline of biodiversity (Higgins, Naugle and Forman 2002). In order to sustain this intensification of farming, nitrogen fertilizers were widely used which then turned to nitrate solute and was leached into the ground water (Wishart 2006). It is noted that Homestead Act of 1862 and Canada Dominion Act of 1872 allowed the sale of Federal land to private owners, which exacerbated the conversion to agriculture (Samson, Knopf and Ostlie 2004). The intensive use of aquifer to satisfy the increasing acreage of irrigated land also caused the drastic shrinkage of the aquifer by 200 million acres (Wishart 2006) Following the European settlement, the Bison were killed in large number for their furs and the competition for forage between bison and horses brought from Europe as well as the diseases transmitted to bison from horses decreased the number of the population of bison (Wishart 2006). The transportation of furs in fur trade also resulted in the deforestation of woodlands along Mississippi River to provide fuels for the steamboats (Wishart 2006). The development of coal, oil and gas would pollute the streams, drain the aquifers and cause environmental damages through their drilling operations (Wishart 2006). It should be noticed that the suppression of fire has caused the change of ecosystem from grasslands to forests. It introduced shrubs which would otherwise have been stopped by intermittent fire. It also reduced the productivity of the grasslands since some of the biomasses could not be decomposed without fire. (Courtwright 2007)
     

 
       There are, amid the bad news, positive impacts from the Great Plains management. The Nature Conservancy has been preserving native land and biodiversity through acquisitions, conservation easement and land exchange between government and private land owners (Wishart 2006). There have also been 110 National Wildlife refuges set up in the Great Plains which constitute 22% of the total national forest in the whole nation (Wishart 2006). Individual farmers have also been gradually trying to implement diversified crops and use less chemical pesticides to be more sustainable (Wishart 2006).

Human Benefits from the Ecosystem

          The human has benefitted throughout centuries from the Great Plains, but the argument can also be framed that the same benefits to humans have caused disturbance and trauma to the ecosystem of the Great Plains. The European settlers benefitted from the burgeoning fur trade of bison and beaver furs which they were able to transport via Missouri River from trading posts to St. Louis (Wishart 2006) which though led to the drastic decrease of bison and beaver populations. Since the early settlers populated the area, the Great Plains has been used extensively for agriculture. Enterprises like cropping, mining, forestry and tourism were developed which yielded resources to humans and provided them with aesthetic pleasures (Mather 1972). The agriculture has been important for the local economies in the Great Plains. For example, the Glaciated Missouri Plateau has been the most heavily farmed areas in the northern Great Plains, with wheat being the no.1 cash crop (Mather 1972). Moreover, livestock production also contributed to the Great Plains economy. It was estimated in 1970 that the livestock production has acted a big role in maintaining the economy, with the northern Great Plains area supporting about 12 million livestock like cattle or sheep (Wight 1976). Although deeply traumatic to the Great Plains ecosystem, the mining industries have been in action in Great Plains. An amount of 50,000 to 120,000 methane wells were estimated to be drilled in the Powder River Basin of Wyoming for the mining industry (Wishart 2006) which would benefit humans but at the jeopardy of the ecosystem.
   

      What contributed the well-being of both human beings and the Great Plains ecosystem are the numerous National grasslands and wildlife refuges as most of the National Grasslands in the US are located in the Great Plains (Wishart 2006). Those areas could be used to raise livestock but more often are provided as scenery attractions for their aesthetic beauties. 

Bibliography

Bibliography
   
                  Hidinger Lori “Pure Prairie League: The State of Great Plains Grasslands” Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America, Vol. 81, No.3 (Jul., 2000) published by: Ecological Society of America
                  http://www.jstor.org/stable/20168445 .
                  
          Higgins, Kenneth F,  Naugle, David E and Forman, Kurt J.   “A case study of changing land use practices in the Northern Great Plains, USA: An Uncertain Future for waterbird  Conservation” Waterbirs: The International Journal of Waterbird Biology, Vol. 25, Special and Managing Wetlans for waterbirds: Integrated Approaches (2002) Published by: Waterbird Society
                  http://www.jstor.org/stable/1522450

         
        Wishart, David J. “Natural Areas, regions, and two centuries of environmental change on the Great Plains” Great Plains Quarterly, Vol.26, No.3 (Summer 2006) Published by: University of Nebraska Press
                http://www.jstor.org/stable/23533731


Samson, Fred B, Knopf, Fritz L, Ostlie, Wayne R. “Great Plains Ecosystem: Past, Present, and Future” Wildlife Society Bulletin, 32 (1) June 15th, 2004. Published by: The Wildlife Society

   Courtwright,Julie. ““When We First Come Here It All Looked Like Prairie Land Almost”: Prairie Fire and Plains Settlement” The Western Historical Quarterly, Vol.38, No.2 (Summer, 2007) Published by: Western Historical Quarterly, Utah State University on behalf of The Western History Association
             http://www.jstor.org/stable/25443505

      
        Mather, E Cotton. “The American Great Plains” Annals of the Association of American Geographer, Vol. 62, No. 2 (June, 1972) Published by: Taylor $ Francis, Ltd. on behalf of the Association of American Geographers
          

Wight, J Ross. “Range Fertilization in the Northern Great Plains” Journal of Range Management, Vol. 29, No.3 (May, 1976) Published by: Allen Press and Society for Range Management
    
 http://www.jstor.org/stable/3897270


"Northern Great Plains." WorldWildlife.org. World Wildlife Fund. Web. 27 Nov. 2014. 
http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/243562/Great-Plains/41393/The-people-and-economy
Case, Ronald M. "Encyclopedia of the Great Plains." Encyclopedia of the Great Plains. University of Nebraska-Lincoln, 1 Jan. 2011. Web. 29 Nov. 2014. 
http://plainshumanities.unl.edu/encyclopedia/doc/egp.ag.076



http://www.worldwildlife.org/places/northern-great-plains

Dietz, John L. "The People and Economy." Encyclopedia Britannica Online. Encyclopedia Britannica, 16 May 2013. Web. 27 Nov. 2014. 





 “About the Refuge – Charles M. Russell.” U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. U.S. Department of the
            Interior, 28 Feb. 2013. Web. 26 Nov. 2014.
“Canadian Forces Base Suffield National Wildlife Area.” Environment Canada. Government of
            Canada, 21 Aug. 2014. Web. 28 Nov. 2014.
“Charles M. Russell National Wildlife Refuge.” National Wildlife Federation. National Wildlife
            Federation, n.d. Web. 26 Nov. 2014.
“Grasslands National Park.” Great Canadian Parks. Canoe.ca, n.d. Web. 28 Nov. 2014.
“Grasslands National Park: Introduction.” Parks Canada. Canada.ca, 16 Aug. 2011. Web. 28 Nov.
            2014.
“History of the Refuge – Charles M. Russell.” U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. U.S. Department of the
            Interior, 27 Feb. 2013. Web. 26 Nov. 2014.
“Northern Great Plains, USA & Canada.” WWF Global. World Wildlife Federation, n.d. Web. 26
            Nov. 2014.
Pence, Chris. “Naturalists Notch Win for Suffield National Wildlife Area.” Wenger. N.p., 30 Nov.
            2013. Web. 28 Nov. 2014.
The Gazette (Montreal). “Where buffalo roam: Grasslands National Park is a forgotten place,
            overshadowed by popular mountain parks like Banff and Jasper.” Canada.com. CanWest
            MediaWorks Publications Inc., 23 July 2007. Web. 28 Nov. 2014.

Forrest, Steve, Holly Strand, Curt Freese, Eric Dinerstein, and Jonathan Proctor. "Ocean of Grass: A           Conservation Assessment for the Northern Great Plains."Ocean of Grass: A Conservation                  Assessment for the Northern Great Plains(n.d.): n. pag. Web. 25 Nov. 2014.
       http://www.protectedareas.info/upload/document/ecoregionplan-          northerngreatplainconservationassessmentsummary.pdf
"Great Plains, USA & Canada."Wildlife Conservation Society. N.p., n.d. Web. 26 Nov. 2014.
        http://www.wcs.org/saving-wild-places/north-america/great-plains.aspx
NORTH AMERICA’S NORTHERN GREAT PLAINS Restoring One of the World’s Premier                          Grassland Ecosystems(n.d.): n. pag. Web. 25 Nov. 2014.                                                                        http://cmsdata.iucn.org/downloads/us_size_n_great_plains_final_note_apr_1.pdf
"Northern Great Plains." WorldWildlife.org. World Wildlife Fund, n.d. Web. 25 Nov. 2014.                          http://www.worldwildlife.org/places/northern-great-plains
Rashford, Benjamin S., Johann Walker, and Anne M. Schrag. "Land Conversion in the Northern                  Great Plains: Past, Present & Future." (n.d.): n. pag. Web. 25 Nov. 2014.                                              http://www.plainsandprairiepotholeslcc.org/wp-            
         content/uploads/2013/05/Rashford_LCC_v2.pdf
Shafer, M., D. Ojima, J. M. Antle, D. Kluck, R. A. McPherson, S. Petersen, B. Scanlon, and K.                    Sherman, 2014: Ch. 19: Great Plains. Climate Change Impacts in the United States: The Third            National Climate Assessment, J. M. Melillo, Terese (T.C.) Richmond, and G. W. Yohe, Eds.,              U.S. Global Change Research Program. Web. 27 Nov 2014.
         http://nca2014.globalchange.gov/report/regions/great-plains
"What We Do."What We Do. Northern Plains Conservation Network, n.d. Web. 25 Nov. 2014.                    http://www.npcn.net/index.php/pages/what